Government Invasion of Privacy Essay Essays

Government Invasion of Privacy Essay Essays Government Invasion of Privacy Essay Essay Government Invasion of Privacy Essay Essay Facebook has become the largest societal media site with over 1 billion active users as of September 14. 2012. Of those 1 billion users on norm for June 2012. 552 million were considered daily active users. ( Potalinski. Oct 4. 2012 ) The universe has gone brainsick with societal media. The ability to update one’s position on anything that has an cyberspace connexion has been enhanced through technological progresss in both phones and tablets. The Federal Government deemed it necessary to supervise societal sites on October 26. 2001 with the origin of the Patriot Act. The autonomies given to the authorities since the Patriot Act was signed into jurisprudence has been debated over the possible misdemeanor of an individual’s privateness. This writer believes the Patriot Act does non go against single privateness rights. : The persons violate their ain rights by what they post. The Federal Government proctors for possible national security menaces through ticker words. The Patriot Act affords them this right. An person has the ability to talk their head. The Federal Government is merely concerned with stations that show possible menaces to national security. There have been 50 instances of menaces to national security since the Patriot Act’s origin in 2001 that have been stopped. Jason from Austin Texas was questioned and released hours following a apparently harmless personal sentiment station on Facebook. Did the Federal Government overstep the autonomies given by the Patriot Act to flush inquiry Jason? Let us happen out what the research reveals. Jason from Austin Texas merely commented on a political station one of his friends had made on Facebook sing the former Senator Rick Santorum. Jason did non uncover his full name to the newsman Jason Brashear who writes for CivilinWars. com with his narrative. For the deficiency of confusion from here on out. the newsman will be noted as Brashear. The remark that got Jason in problem was â€Å"I wish there was a charming wand to do Santorum disappear†¦Ã¢â‚¬  This station was taken straight off of the station yarn on February 20. 2012. The Austin Police and two Williamson County Sherriff’s deputies were alerted to the station and tried to turn up Jason. After unsuccessfully happening Jason at his work. the officers called Jason and set up a meeting subsequently that flushing at Jason’s place. The officers explained they were at that place because of a possible menace to Senator Santorum. Jason did non cognize that Senator Santorum had a visit planned for Austin in the following few yearss. The visit was far plenty in the hereafter from the station for the local jurisprudence enforcement to be sent to Jason’s house to look into the possible menace. The officers were at that place to look around the house for any images of the Senator or grounds of anything planned against the Senator. The local governments deemed that Jason was non a menace and no farther action was taken against him. Jason’s Facebook security scenes were set up as private. The private scenes mean the stations are treated like a private e-mail amongst friends. ( Brashear. Feb 25. 2012 ) It was the perfect storm for Jason a apparently harmless station. the topic of the station coming to town in a short clip. and the Federal Government monitoring for cardinal words or phrases. The Federal Government merely reacted to identify words that pinged through their trailing system. The single privateness rights of Jason were non violated due to the contents of his station and the possible national security hazard to the presidential campaigner former Senator Santorum. Jason’s station threw up ruddy flags through the Department of Homeland Security societal media supervising system with the usage of one word. Because the station contained the word Santorum. the staying words became relevant to any probes that followed. Because the former Senator was a possible presidential campaigner for the Republican Party his name became a ruddy flag point for the Department of Homeland Security. Had Jason make the same station. but eliminate the usage of Santorum’s name. it is the belief of this writer that there would hold been no visit from the local governments. The usage of the former Senator’s name on a societal media site was the cause of the probe of Jason by the governments. It is the Federal Government’s occupation to measure every possible menace both foreign and domestic. By Santorum trying to go the Republican Party’s campaigner for President of the United States. he became a possible mark for Acts of the Apostless of terrorist act or force against that needed protection. If the monitoring of societal media by the Federal Government was non in topographic point. Jason may hold been plotting an onslaught on former Senator Santorum and executed a program of onslaught without notice. It is because of the Patriot Act and the autonomies to supervise the universe through societal media sites that enabled the Federal Government to look into Jason as a possible menace. do a determination that he was non a menace. and let him to return to his mundane life. This has non been the instance for other possible terrorists after the Patriot Act was signed into jurisprudence in 2001. Since the origin of the Patriot Act in October of 2001. 50 possible terrorist secret plans have been averted. ( Carafano. Bucci. Zuckerman. Apr 25. 2012 ) All 50 of the possible menaces vary with how engineering aided in the information being obtained by the Federal Government. Every one of the menaces were straight affected by the Patriot Act. The Patriot Act is Uniting and Strengthening America by Supplying Appropriate Tools Required to Interrupt and Obstruct Terrorism ( USA PATRIOT ACT ) Act of 2001. ( Public Law 107-56. Oct 26. 2001 ) The Patriot Act deemed it necessary to supervise the altering technological universe. It covers everything from national to international menace. banking to societal media. and terrorist to good citizen. Through the old ages the Federal Government has created a bombilation word database that generates a â€Å"red flag† when seen or heard. The Department of Homeland Security released a transcript of their Analyst’s Desktop Binder in 2011 which houses 337 words or phrases that are considered buzz words. The words or phrases that are contained in the Analyst’s Desktop Binder are considered a baseline or the beginning. This means that at a minimal the 337 words or phrases listed are monitored on a day-to-day footing. Wordss or phrases are added to and removed from the list on a day-to-day footing. The list is modified based on current events go oning. Current events change what may go a mark for Acts of the Apostless of force and terrorist act. These words are monitored through the Department of Homeland Security’s National Operations Center. The Department of Homeland Security’s web site ( hypertext transfer protocol: //www. dhs. gov/about-office-operations-coordination-and-planning ) describes the National Operations Center. â€Å"Through the National Operations Center. the Office provides real-time situational consciousness and monitoring of the fatherland. coordinates incidents and response activities. and. in concurrence with the Office of Intelligence and Analysis. issues advisories and bulletins refering menaces to homeland security. every bit good as specific protective steps. The NOC – which operates 24 hours a twenty-four hours. seven yearss a hebdomad. 365 yearss a twelvemonth – coordinates information sharing to assist deter. detect. and prevent terrorist Acts of the Apostless and to pull off domestic incidents. Information on domestic incident direction is shared with Emergency Operations Centers at all degrees through the Homeland Security Information Network ( HSIN ) . † The NOC is the monitoring centre for the Department of Homeland Security. They are the responsible for monitoring and pass oning possible menaces to other bureaus within the Federal Government. Most if non all possible menaces that are stopped by the Federal Government are a direct consequence of the NOC monitoring and communicating system. The Federal Governments need to supervise the increasing popularity of societal media is based on some of the Numberss discussed before. As of November 19. 2012 there was an estimated 7 billion people in the universe. ( World Wide Web. nose count. gov. November 19. 2012 ) That means that over 14 % of the world’s population are considered active users of Facebook and 7 % are active day-to-day users. Active users are persons that have histories but may non log on every twenty-four hours. The active day-to-day user Numberss describe an single logging onto their history each twenty-four hours. If an history holder’s privateness scenes are non rigorous. they have the ability to post anything for anyone to see. Let us believe back to Jason for a minute. his security scenes were rigorous and he was questioned by the local governments for his station. Without the Patriot Act leting for the monitoring of societal media sites like Facebook. Jason’s station would non hold been seen by anyone but whom he allows to see his information. The Patriot Act enables Federal Government bureaus like NOC to see an individual’s information regardless of the security scenes. On an history holder’s Facebook page. they are invited to post â€Å"What’s on your mind† upon first logging on to the site. The single privateness is compromised when the person really writes what is on their head. If any of the 337 words or phrases are used in a station. electronic mail. or blog the NOC will cognize. The NOC will so advise the appropriate local. province. or national governments to look into the possible menace. Jason may hold been unfortunate plenty to hold received a visit from the local governments. but what if he really posed a possible menace to the presidential campaigner and nil was done about it? The Patriot Act and the Federal Government’s need to supervise engineering and societal media has aided in taking possible injury to the huge bulk of our state. Some may reason that the Patriot violates single privateness and their right to freedom of address. This writer believes that without the Patriot Act and the autonomies granted to the Federal Government to supervise the people of this universe through the societal media sites like Facebook. there would be a batch more terrorist actions that have succeeded. The Federal Government’s ability to place and be afforded adequate clip to respond to possible menaces through supervising the societal media sites like Facebook has made this state a safer topographic point to populate. MentionsBrashear. J. ( Feb 25. 2012 ) . Retrieved from: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. citizenwars. com/facebook-user-interrogated-authorities-post/ Carafano. J. . Bucci. S. . Zuckerman. J. ( Apr 25. 2012 ) . Retrieved from: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. heritage. org/research/reports/2012/04/fifty-terror-plots-foiled-since-9-11-the-homegrown-threat-and-the-long-war-on-terrorism Department of Homeland Security. 2011. Analyst’s Desktop Binder. Retrieved from: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. dhs. gov Patriot Act. ( 2001 ) . Retrieved from: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. justness. gov/archive/ll/highlights. htm. ( Choice â€Å"Text of the Patriot Act† ) Potalinski. E. ( Oct 4. 2012 ) . Retrieved from: hypertext transfer protocol: //thenextweb. com/facebook/2012/10/04/facebook-hits-1-billion-active-users/